HOWTO Discussion:Writing BioPerl Tests

From BioPerl
Jump to: navigation, search
  • Do we want to change remote DB tests so that BIOPERLDEBUG is only for debugging output (level of verbosity), and BIOPERLNETWORK or similar is used for remote tests?
  1. I think having separate variables would make more sense since there are distinct reasons for using each. It would enable things like the user being asked during installation whether they want to run the net tests. Dave Messina 23:52, 16 April 2007 (EDT)
  2. I already have a system in place for the user to say Build.PL --network to run network tests; its just untested and unused. See the commented out section of Build.PL. I'll resolve this into a usable system closer to the next release. Senduran 06:57, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
  3. Sounds good! We can discuss more on the mail list prior to the next release but looks fine to me; suppose we'll make the necessary changes here when needed. As an additional note, while going through the tests I found a few others that required network tests which were not bypassed (OntologyStore.t was one, for instance, which seemded to access remote GO-related stuff). --Chris Fields 11:39, 18 April 2007 (EDT)
Personal tools
Namespaces
Variants
Actions
Main Links
documentation
community
development
Toolbox